View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0012338 | ParaView | (No Category) | public | 2011-07-06 12:14 | 2016-08-12 09:58 | ||||
Reporter | Sebastien Jourdain | ||||||||
Assigned To | Kitware Robot | ||||||||
Priority | low | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
Status | closed | Resolution | moved | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | Development | ||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
Summary | 0012338: No lookup table set on a filter when applied on a generic dataset that is hidden | ||||||||
Description | When the dataset is visible everything is fine but as soon as the dataset get hidden either by another filter if we apply a new filter to it, that new filter will miss that lookup table and the default weird VTK one will be created but won't be mentioned in the XML state file. | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Project | TBD | ||||||||
Topic Name | |||||||||
Type | incorrect functionality | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
Relationships | |
Relationships |
Notes | |
(0037997) Kitware Robot (administrator) 2016-08-12 09:58 |
Resolving issue as `moved`. This issue tracker is no longer used. Further discussion of this issue may take place in the current ParaView Issues page linked in the banner at the top of this page. |
Notes |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2011-07-06 12:14 | Sebastien Jourdain | New Issue | |
2016-08-12 09:58 | Kitware Robot | Note Added: 0037997 | |
2016-08-12 09:58 | Kitware Robot | Status | backlog => closed |
2016-08-12 09:58 | Kitware Robot | Resolution | open => moved |
2016-08-12 09:58 | Kitware Robot | Assigned To | => Kitware Robot |
Issue History |
Copyright © 2000 - 2018 MantisBT Team |