View Issue Details Jump to Notes ] Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0006067ParaView(No Category)public2007-11-19 18:342008-03-07 07:56
ReporterDavid Karelitz 
Assigned ToDavid Karelitz 
PrioritynormalSeveritymajorReproducibilityalways
StatusclosedResolutionfixed 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0006067: (MARS-high) Save and disconnect results in repeat geometry
DescriptionWhen saving and disconnecting with AMRCTH data, the geometry appears to be duplicated from one timestep to another. The time value label updates, but the geometry might repeat for 2 or 3 timesteps before new geometry is shown.
TagsNo tags attached.
Project
Topic Name
Type
Attached Files

 Relationships

  Notes
(0010056)
David Karelitz (reporter)
2008-01-03 10:20

This happens with Exodus data as well.

When saving an animation using the GUI or through pvbatch, 3D geometry is not always from the correct timestep. If I open can.exo (which I believe Kitware has), add a time annotator, and save the animation, I get a the correct number of frames (one per timestep). The timestamp on each frame is correct, but the geometry is not correct. It is often duplicated from the previous frame. Out of 43 frames, there are only 33 different geometries.

If I load the state into the GUI, I see the same timestep discrepancies that I saw in the animation images. If I then open can.exo (with the version from the state file still there), the timesteps are still wrong. If I delete everything and open can.exo, the timesteps are correct.
(0010057)
David Karelitz (reporter)
2008-01-03 15:16

This turned out to be a problem due to the precision of the time values saved in pvsm files versus the precision used in the readers. It was fixed for Exodus and CTH by modifying the reader to snap to the nearest timestep versus the first timestep larger than the requested value.
(0010271)
Alan Scott (manager)
2008-01-23 17:00

Tested client/server - using can.exo
(0010294)
Alan Scott (manager)
2008-01-24 16:53

As per Dave, there are cases with some data and some clusters that this bug still occurs. Not to be closed until Dave says it is OK.
(0010305)
David Karelitz (reporter)
2008-01-28 10:32

Misunderstanding between myself and Alan as to which bug should remain open

 Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2007-11-19 18:34 David Karelitz New Issue
2008-01-03 10:20 David Karelitz Note Added: 0010056
2008-01-03 15:16 David Karelitz Status backlog => @80@
2008-01-03 15:16 David Karelitz Resolution open => fixed
2008-01-03 15:16 David Karelitz Assigned To => David Karelitz
2008-01-03 15:16 David Karelitz Note Added: 0010057
2008-01-23 17:00 Alan Scott Status @80@ => closed
2008-01-23 17:00 Alan Scott Note Added: 0010271
2008-01-24 16:53 Alan Scott Note Added: 0010294
2008-01-24 16:53 Alan Scott Status closed => tabled
2008-01-28 10:32 David Karelitz Status tabled => closed
2008-01-28 10:32 David Karelitz Note Added: 0010305
2008-03-07 07:56 Berk Geveci Target Version => MARS
2011-06-16 13:10 Zack Galbreath Category => (No Category)


Copyright © 2000 - 2018 MantisBT Team