Please change the mailing list so the default "reply to" is the list and not the person who last responded.<br><br>I realized my mistake once it was already sent, but I didn't follow up to the list since I figured you'd reply to the list if you thought it warranted public attention.<br>
<br>Juan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Berk Geveci <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:berk.geveci@kitware.com">berk.geveci@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Juan,<br>
<br>
Please direct your questions to the ParaView mailing list instead of<br>
me. I believe that we will have some sort of CGNS support in the next<br>
release. It may take some time to mature though.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-berk<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:45 PM, j s <<a href="mailto:j.s4403@gmail.com">j.s4403@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I am from the TCAD field, which is CFD related. Unfortunately it has always<br>
> been based on proprietary data formats. Thanks for pointing out CGNS. I<br>
> had no idea paraview would be supporting it. What time frame were you<br>
> expecting for CGNS support in your tool.<br>
><br>
> Juan<br>
><br>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Berk Geveci <<a href="mailto:berk.geveci@kitware.com">berk.geveci@kitware.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> > Thanks for your response. I guess I was talking about visualization.<br>
>> > Would<br>
>> > Ensight be considered an industry standard?<br>
>><br>
>> As close as you will get to a standard. If you are in the CFD field,<br>
>> you may want to look into CGNS too. We will have CGNS support<br>
>> relatively soon.<br>
>><br>
>> -berk<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, j s <<a href="mailto:j.s4403@gmail.com">j.s4403@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > Thanks for your response. I guess I was talking about visualization.<br>
>> > Would<br>
>> > Ensight be considered an industry standard?<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Juan<br>
>> ><br>
>> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Berk Geveci <<a href="mailto:berk.geveci@kitware.com">berk.geveci@kitware.com</a>><br>
>> > wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> What do you mean by portable? Across visualization applications or<br>
>> >> across platforms? Across visualization applications, you best bet is<br>
>> >> probably EnSight.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> -berk<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:56 PM, j s <<a href="mailto:j.s4403@gmail.com">j.s4403@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> > Hello,<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > I was wondering what everyone would consider to be the most portable<br>
>> >> > format<br>
>> >> > for:<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > 1. multi-zone<br>
>> >> > 2. unstructured<br>
>> >> > 3. 2d or 3d<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > mesh data.<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > Thanks Everyone,<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > Juan<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> > ParaView mailing list<br>
>> >> > <a href="mailto:ParaView@paraview.org">ParaView@paraview.org</a><br>
>> >> > <a href="http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview" target="_blank">http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview</a><br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>