Thanks for the reminder Mike, the web pages have now been updated.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Michael Jackson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike.jackson@bluequartz.net">mike.jackson@bluequartz.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Great. And what branch is being used for the RC-1?<br>
<br>
Maybe the ParaView Downloads page should be updated or at least annotated with the fact that git is now being used instead of CVS?<div class="im"><br>
--<br>
Mike Jackson <<a href="http://www.bluequartz.net" target="_blank">www.bluequartz.net</a>><br>
<br></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
On Apr 26, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Dave Partyka wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
VTK and ParaView are now using Git.<br>
<br>
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Michael Jackson <<a href="mailto:mike.jackson@bluequartz.net" target="_blank">mike.jackson@bluequartz.net</a>> wrote:<br>
Dave,<br>
I am really confused. Is ParaView on Git or CVS? Last I was told I should still be using CVS for the 3.8-RC1 branch? Should I be pulling from Git now instead?<br>
<br>
Thanks for any clarifications.<br>
--<br>
Mike Jackson <<a href="http://www.bluequartz.net" target="_blank">www.bluequartz.net</a>><br>
<br>
<br>
On Apr 26, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Dave Partyka wrote:<br>
<br>
We switched to git!<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>