<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Oops, I should have re-titled this email.<br>
<br>
What I meant to say, is the images in the previous email are showing
one of the issues I have been seeing with the data set. I recently
pulled and rebuilt ParaView from source and things are better:<br>
a) It is not crashing with this data set; yay!<br>
b) Not displaying those crazy bounds - though sometimes it loads and
does not show anything;<br>
c) And I think I saw on the git log that Utkarsh fixed a crashing
bug when a xdmf temporal collection had no time step specified (so
thanks Utkarsh! and whoever else fixed bugs :-)<br>
<br>
Jon<br>
<br>
On 2/8/2011 6:43 PM, Jon Goldman wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4D51F15B.7070602@stellarscience.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<tt>To followup a bit, attached are two images of the issue I am
seeing.<br>
<br>
The two-lobe rendering (from another package) is correct.<br>
The single lobe that is rendered with ParaView is incorrect.<br>
<br>
And if somebody would be kind enough to download the sample data
and verify what I am seeing:<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://pages.swcp.com/%7Egoldman/data/farfield/farfield.xmf.zip">http://pages.swcp.com/~goldman/data/farfield/farfield.xmf.zip</a><br>
<br>
</tt><tt>And/or if anybody knowledgeable on the xdmf or paraview
source code can suggest an area of the code to look at, I can
dig in to figure out what's going on.<br>
<br>
thanks,<br>
Jon</tt><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>