Excellent. Thank you! I'll make this into a regression test for ParaView.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Takuya OSHIMA <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:oshima@eng.niigata-u.ac.jp">oshima@eng.niigata-u.ac.jp</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Yes the cavity tutorial. AFAIK there's no OpenFOAM dataset being used<br>
for testing ( <a href="http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=10247" target="_blank">http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=10247</a> ), so I<br>
attached Mark's cavity dataset (with addition of a .foam stub). Dave,<br>
open cavity.foam in the archive and Apply.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
Takuya<br>
<br>
Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.<br>
Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University<br>
8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN<br>
<br>
</div>From: "OLESEN Mark" <<a href="mailto:mark.olesen@faurecia.com">mark.olesen@faurecia.com</a>><br>
Subject: RE: [Paraview] paraview 3.10 + OpenFOAM<br>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:06:10 +0100<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
> Is there currently any particular OpenFOAM dataset being used for testing? If so, I could convert it into the compact-face format.<br>
><br>
> Otherwise the dataset from Takuya (cavity tutorial I think) should be okay - there are no license issues.<br>
><br>
>> I have a dataset contributed by Mark but am not sure about its<br>
>> license. Mark, do you have any?<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>