<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>Obviously I prefer David's approach of fixing it so it's always on :) <br><br>But, if for some reason it can't be fixed by next release, making the option advanced again is good enough. <br><br>Thanks again,<br><br>Tim<br><br><hr id="zwchr"><b>From: </b>"David Partyka" <david.partyka@kitware.com><br><b>To: </b>"Utkarsh Ayachit" <utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com><br><b>Cc: </b>gtg085x@mail.gatech.edu, "ParaView list" <paraview@paraview.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Monday, August 1, 2011 12:05:15 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Paraview] Xdmf on master branch<br><br>That should work. Ideally we can get packaging XDMF's python module working properly for the next major release. I just created a bug for that task here:<div><br></div><div><a href="http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12445" target="_blank">http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12445</a><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com" target="_blank">utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
I think making the option advanced makes sense. Dave, any objections?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Utkarsh<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Tim Gallagher <<a href="mailto:tim.gallagher@gatech.edu" target="_blank">tim.gallagher@gatech.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> I just built off the master branch (commit 4f0d9672) and I noticed XDMF_WRAP_PYTHON was no longer an option.<br>
><br>
> It appears it was set to INTERNAL in commit 7ac1f751, which was due to the conversation in the mailing list (<a href="http://markmail.org/message/gapnf4reuazdtfcn" target="_blank">http://markmail.org/message/gapnf4reuazdtfcn</a>), although I'm not sure if it was made INTERNAL and ON prior to trying to release and just turned to OFF at last minute because of the problems.<br>
><br>
> Is fixing the CPack issue high on the priority list so the binaries will ship with the XDMF python wrapper? If not, can we revert to the XDMF_WRAP_PYTHON option as advanced and not INTERNAL?<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
><br>
> Tim<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
><br>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
><br>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: <a href="http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView" target="_blank">http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView</a><br>
><br>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
> <a href="http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview" target="_blank">http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview</a><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></body></html>