Thanks for the info Leo,<br><br>I am, however, having trouble building the source that I've downloaded.<br><br>Could you point me to any instructions on how to build? <a href="http://paraview.org/Wiki/index.php?title=ParaView:Build_And_Install&oldid=46445#On_Unix-like_operating_systems_2">http://paraview.org/Wiki/index.php?title=ParaView:Build_And_Install&oldid=46445#On_Unix-like_operating_systems_2</a> doesn't seem to tie up with the files I get.<br>
<br>These are the files I've pulled from Git:<br><br><span style="font-family:courier new,monospace">-rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 364 Oct 23 09:43 <a href="http://ParaViewConfigVersion.cmake.in">ParaViewConfigVersion.cmake.in</a><br>
-rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 2.6K Oct 23 09:43 <a href="http://ParaViewConfig.cmake.in">ParaViewConfig.cmake.in</a><br>-rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 15K Oct 23 09:43 License_v1.2.txt<br>-rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 583 Oct 23 09:43 DartConfig.cmake<br>
-rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 539 Oct 23 09:43 CTestConfig.cmake<br>-rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 24K Oct 23 09:43 CMakeLists.txt<br>-rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 3.2K Oct 23 09:43 <a href="http://vtkPVConfig.h.in">vtkPVConfig.h.in</a><br>
-rw-r--r-- 1 joe.borg root 5.0K Oct 23 09:43 cave.pvx<br>drwxr-xr-x 5 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:54 Examples/<br>drwxr-xr-x 26 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:55 Plugins/<br>drwxr-xr-x 13 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:56 Utilities/<br>
drwxr-xr-x 2 joe.borg root 12K Oct 23 09:56 CMake/<br>drwxr-xr-x 11 joe.borg root 12K Oct 23 09:56 SuperBuild/<br>drwxr-xr-x 5 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:56 CoProcessing/<br>drwxr-xr-x 2 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:56 CommandLineExecutables/<br>
drwxr-xr-x 4 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:56 Wrapping/<br>drwxr-xr-x 3 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:56 Common/<br>drwxr-xr-x 7 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 09:57 Qt/<br>drwxr-xr-x 24 joe.borg root 8.0K Oct 23 10:01 VTK/<br>
drwxr-xr-x 5 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 10:01 ThirdParty/<br>drwxr-xr-x 9 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 10:02 ParaViewCore/<br>drwxr-xr-x 3 joe.borg root 4.0K Oct 23 10:02 Applications/</span><br><br clear="all">Thanks.<br clear="all">
<br>Regards,<br>Joseph David Borġ <br><a href="http://www.jdborg.com" target="_blank">http://www.jdborg.com</a><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 19 October 2012 21:43, Yuanxin Liu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leo.liu@kitware.com" target="_blank">leo.liu@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi, Joe,<div>Â Berk reminded me that Andy Bauer has put in some fixes for gradient interpolation for pyramids (5a7dc931c54d868). Â Since your data contain pyramids, this is quite likely the fix for this bug.</div><div>Leo</div>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Yuanxin Liu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leo.liu@kitware.com" target="_blank">leo.liu@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi, Joe,<div>Â It looks like this was indeed a bug in 3.14.1 but the bug has been fixed in the current development branch. I am not entirely sure which commit explicitly did it. Â Â </div><div>Â </div><div>Leo</div><div>
<div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Joe Borġ <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mail@jdborg.com" target="_blank">mail@jdborg.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br><br>I am using 3.14.1 64-bit on a single core (if I enable multi-core, it becomes very unstable).<br><br>Adding tets to this small case works, but I've got a bigger duct with a more refined mesh and adding tets don't fix the problem (make it better though).<br>
<br>See attached PVSM.<div><br clear="all"><br clear="all"><br>Regards,<br>Joseph David Borġ <br><a href="http://www.jdborg.com" target="_blank">http://www.jdborg.com</a><br>
<br><br></div><div><div><div class="gmail_quote">On 18 October 2012 19:00, Yuanxin Liu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leo.liu@kitware.com" target="_blank">leo.liu@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
No, I did not use Tetrahedralize.   <div><br></div><div>Are you using the lastest development version?  Are you running paraview as a single process?</div><div><br></div><div>Do you mind saving a state file of your session and post it? </div>
<div><br></div><div>thanks!</div><div><br></div><div>Leo<div><div><br><div><br></div><div><div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Joe Borġ <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mail@jdborg.com" target="_blank">mail@jdborg.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Leo,<br><br>You don't seem to have used the Tetrahedralise filter? How have you got this to work without that?<br>
<br>Mine works fine after setting the fluid as input and source as the inlet, but I must first use the Tetrahedralise filter. <br clear="all"><div>
<br clear="all"><br>Regards,<br>Joseph David Borġ <br><a href="http://www.jdborg.com" target="_blank">http://www.jdborg.com</a><br>
<br><br></div><div><div><div class="gmail_quote">On 17 October 2012 18:14, Yuanxin Liu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leo.liu@kitware.com" target="_blank">leo.liu@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>Hi Joe,</div><div><br></div>I am not seeing exactly what you are seeing.  In the attached image produced with the current master, I created a stream tracer with outlet block as the seeds and the fluid block as the input, and the streamlines seem right. <div>
<br></div><div>But I think there is a bug in how the stream tracer handles multiblock data, because if I change the stream tracer input to the whole pipe data set, instead of just the fluid block, some stream lines go straight to the void like you described.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Can you try setting up the pipeline as I did using ExtractBlock and compare with my image?</div><div><br></div><div>Leo</div><div><div><div><div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Magician <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:f_magician@mac.com" target="_blank">f_magician@mac.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Joe,<br>
<br>
<br>
"Tetrahedralize" filter is applicable.<br>
All cells are splitted into Tetrahedral ones.<br>
Try it.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Magician<br>
</font></span><div><div><br>
<br>
On 2012/10/17, at 23:40, Joe Borġ wrote:<br>
<br>
> Thanks Magician,<br>
><br>
> Thanks for testing. Â What are you using to convert to tet? Â Is it a ParaView feature?<br>
><br>
> Leo, can the priority of the bug be raised please?<br>
><br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
> Joseph David Borġ<br>
> <a href="http://www.jdborg.com" target="_blank">http://www.jdborg.com</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> On 17 October 2012 14:20, Magician <<a href="mailto:f_magician@mac.com" target="_blank">f_magician@mac.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Joseph,<br>
><br>
><br>
> I tried your data and got a result as yours.<br>
> Your data only includes Hex, Wedge, Tet and Pyramid,<br>
> but streamlines are stopped earlier.<br>
><br>
> Same as my polyhedral pipe sample, I applied Tetrahedralize filter<br>
> to your pipe source, and I could get valid streamlines.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Magician<br>
><br>
><br>
> > Pipe.tar.gz attached to the bug report below, in the form of an Ensight<br>
> > Case. Â First extract the archive and to open in Paraview, use "All files<br>
> > (*)" when browsing and select the .encas, then select "EnSight Files".<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Regards,<br>
> > Joseph David Borġ<br>
> > <a href="http://www.jdborg.com" target="_blank">http://www.jdborg.com</a><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On 12 October 2012 03:28, Yuanxin Liu <leo.liu at <a href="http://kitware.com" target="_blank">kitware.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > > Hi,<br>
> > > Â Â Is it possible for you to upload the data? Â By the way, if the cell<br>
> > > type is polyhedron, then this is quite likely the same bug as this:<br>
> > > <a href="http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=13442" target="_blank">http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=13442</a><br>
> > ><br>
> > > Leo<br>
> > ><br>
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Joe Borġ <mail at <a href="http://jdborg.com" target="_blank">jdborg.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > ><br>
> > >> Hi guys,<br>
> > >><br>
> > >> I've got an odd issue with the stream trace and stream trace custom<br>
> > >> source filters in Paraview (3.14.1 64bit). Â No matter what settings I use,<br>
> > >> the traces die off very soon and some even carry on straight (even when<br>
> > >> there's no fluid).<br>
> > >><br>
> > >> See the two screenshots I've got from Paraview.<br>
> > >><br>
> > >> <a href="http://jdborg.com/images/paraview/pv_inlet.png" target="_blank">http://jdborg.com/images/paraview/pv_inlet.png</a><br>
> > >> <a href="http://jdborg.com/images/paraview/pv_outlet.png" target="_blank">http://jdborg.com/images/paraview/pv_outlet.png</a><br>
> > >><br>
> > >><br>
> > >> Not sure if this is a setting that's easy to miss or if it's more<br>
> > >> terminal.<br>
> > >><br>
> > >> Thanks,<br>
> > >><br>
> > >><br>
> > >> Regards,<br>
> > >> Joseph David Borġ<br>
> > >> <a href="http://www.jdborg.com" target="_blank">http://www.jdborg.com</a><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>