<div dir="ltr">Sorry to resurrect this thread. I recently sent an email to the list but didn't receive a response.<div><br></div><div>I am trying to use the Temporal Particles to Pathlines filter. But it doesn't produce any pathlines, only instantaneous particles.</div>
<div><br></div><div style>Any advice?</div><div style><br></div><div style>Thanks,</div><div style>Ryan</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Christian Richter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:christian.richter@ovgu.de" target="_blank">christian.richter@ovgu.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Leo,<br>
<br>
yes that works, thank you & happy new year !<br>
<br>
Christian<br>
<br>
Zitat von Yuanxin Liu <<a href="mailto:leo.liu@kitware.com" target="_blank">leo.liu@kitware.com</a>>:<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi, Christian,<br>
It seems just adding back the XML description is enough to fix this. Can<br>
you verify by applying the attached patch and see if it works for you? ( cd<br>
to your ParaView source dir, and run "git apply add-particle-path.diff" ).<br>
<br>
Note that, to differentiate from the new stuff, I have changed the<br>
filter name from "Particle Pathlines" --> "Temporal Particles To Pathlines".<br>
<br>
thanks,<br>
Leo<br>
<br>
<br>
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Christian Richter <<br>
<a href="mailto:christian.richter@ovgu.de" target="_blank">christian.richter@ovgu.de</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Leo,<br>
<br>
I attached you the simplest testcase I can made, one STL and one vtk<br>
containing only one particle.<br>
At the image you see the expected output as it was in 3.14.1.<br>
<br>
Thanks for fixis this,<br>
Christian<br>
<br>
Am 06.12.2012 16:50, schrieb Yuanxin Liu:<br>
<br>
Hi, Christian,<br>
We can the filter back (probably under a different name). Do you mind<br>
sending me the data file you have?<br>
thanks!<br>
Leo<br>
<br>
<br>
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Christian Richter <<br>
<a href="mailto:christian.richter@ovgu.de" target="_blank">christian.richter@ovgu.de</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Leo,<br>
<br>
thanks for your answer.<br>
My Problem is, I only have particle data (Position at dumptime, velocity<br>
at dumptime) and no vector field (result of a simple DEM-Simulation).<br>
<br>
I read your article and played arround with TerminationTime and the<br>
Animation Panel but I found no solution. And because the old filter works<br>
well the c&p solution is the best for my case. I would like to ask if we<br>
could have both filter in PV 4 - the best filter for each special case.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Christian<br>
<br>
Am 05.12.2012 21:05, schrieb Yuanxin Liu:<br>
<br>
Hi, Christian,<br>
<br>
The old ParticlePathLine filter is replaced by ParticlePath filter.<br>
Unlike the old one, you do not have to attach it to a particle tracer.<br>
Also make sure you set the "TerminationTime" parameter to the largest<br>
possible time.<br>
<br>
I have written an article about this work: .<br>
<a href="http://www.kitware.com/source/home/post/76" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/source/<u></u>home/post/76</a><br>
<br>
Let me know if this works for you.<br>
<br>
thanks,<br>
<br>
Leo<br>
<br>
<br>
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Christian Richter <<br>
<a href="mailto:christian.richter@ovgu.de" target="_blank">christian.richter@ovgu.de</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hello,<br>
<br>
in Paraview 3.98 the ParticlePathLines Filter is gone away. We use this<br>
to show the trajectory of simple particle data (x,y,z), based on ID. Is<br>
this intended ?<br>
<br>
I got it back by copy & paste the proxysource from filter.xml in 3.14<br>
(line 6679++) to 3.98. Would it be possible to add back the old<br>
ParticlePathlines Filter (with single inputsource and Pathline & Particle<br>
as output) in 3.98 because I love the webGL scene export in the new<br>
Paraview.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Christian<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
<br>
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at<br>
<a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/<u></u>opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
<br>
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:<br>
<a href="http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView" target="_blank">http://paraview.org/Wiki/<u></u>ParaView</a><br>
<br>
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview" target="_blank">http://www.paraview.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/paraview</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
<br>
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/<u></u>opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
<br>
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: <a href="http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView" target="_blank">http://paraview.org/Wiki/<u></u>ParaView</a><br>
<br>
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview" target="_blank">http://www.paraview.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/paraview</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>