<div dir="ltr">Rick,<div><br></div><div>Coincidentally, I am looking at the CTH parts class of filters right now. Can you share the data or the images with the holes?</div><div><br></div><div>Utkarsh</div></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard.c.angelini.civ@mail.mil" target="_blank">richard.c.angelini.civ@mail.mil</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Classification: UNCLASSIFIED<br>
Caveats: NONE<br>
<br>
Alan - yeah, the dataset opens correctly with < 80 servers. It doesn't<br>
matter how I distribute those 80 servers - I can do 16 processes on 5 nodes,<br>
8 processes on 10 nodes and it works. If I play the same game with > 80<br>
nodes, I start seeing the holes. I *doubt* that it's a bad node, but I'll<br>
do some deeper investigating just to verify.<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Scott, W Alan [mailto:<a href="mailto:wascott@sandia.gov">wascott@sandia.gov</a>]<br>
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:43 PM<br>
To: Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US); <a href="mailto:paraview@paraview.org">paraview@paraview.org</a><br>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] extract CTH parts (UNCLASSIFIED)<br>
<br>
Bad node?<br>
<br>
Try running the problem on a few nodes. Next, try running the "big node"<br>
problem. As you shift the nodes you are using, does the issue follow the<br>
underlying iron, or the same bad blocks in the dataset?<br>
<br>
Dataset opens correctly with smaller number of nodes?<br>
<br>
Want me to try it here? 80 does seem really, really small/easy/trivial for<br>
big data...<br>
<br>
Alan<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:paraview-bounces@paraview.org">paraview-bounces@paraview.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:paraview-bounces@paraview.org">paraview-bounces@paraview.org</a>]<br>
On Behalf Of Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US)<br>
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:38 PM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:paraview@paraview.org">paraview@paraview.org</a><br>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] extract CTH parts (UNCLASSIFIED)<br>
<br>
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED<br>
Caveats: NONE<br>
<br>
I'm having an issue with the extract CTH parts filter in ParaView 4.0.1.<br>
The dataset consists of 1024 spcth files, regular structured mesh, 14<br>
blocks. The issue seems to be that once I exceed X number of server<br>
processes (it seems to be about 80 servers), I start seeing holes in the<br>
resulting geometry. The more I exceed the magic number of servers, the more<br>
holes I see in the resulting part. If I create a clip using the<br>
volume_fraction scalar variable(s), the geometry of the clip is correct -<br>
that is, the underlying data seems to be there. So, I'm thinking that the<br>
data is being properly distributed and all of the data is accounted for, but<br>
that there's an issue with the "extract CTH parts" filter? Doesn't seem<br>
likely, but stranger things have happened.<br>
<br>
Any ideas?<br>
<br>
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED<br>
Caveats: NONE<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>Classification: UNCLASSIFIED<br>
Caveats: NONE<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
<br>
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
<br>
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: <a href="http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView" target="_blank">http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView</a><br>
<br>
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview" target="_blank">http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>