Notes |
|
(0022061)
|
Utkarsh Ayachit
|
2010-09-01 11:20
|
|
I'd vote for adding a filter that rendering the block wireframe and then he can simply apply that filter and show both the surface of the original data and the result of this filter. |
|
|
(0022067)
|
Alan Scott
|
2010-09-01 12:29
(edited on: 2010-09-01 12:32) |
|
That sounds acceptable to me. One question - will we have problem with stitching? I assume the filter will have to use the Coincident Topology Resolution functionality.
|
|
|
(0025222)
|
Alan Scott
|
2011-02-01 20:19
|
|
I am sending a set of screenshots to Utkarsh, showing what I want. These screenshots also show bug number 11065.
Screenshot 000000 - This shows the desired foreground pattern for this bug. |
|
|
(0029099)
|
Utkarsh Ayachit
|
2012-09-01 20:50
|
|
commit 0c1121d78bf9136f3686f91d5d7f93b68660324e
Author: Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit@kitware.com>
Date: Sat Sep 1 20:40:07 2012 -0400
BUG 0011065. Added support for "enhanced outline" for AMR.
For AMR, instead of showing merely the outer outline, we now show the outer
outline etched with the dataset outlines. Unlike in past, the internal block
outlines are not shown, merely those on the outer surface.
Also for overlapping AMR, outline doesnt' need any heavy data. It merely uses
the AMR box information. |
|
|
(0029100)
|
Utkarsh Ayachit
|
2012-09-01 20:51
|
|
To test simply open a CTH or any other AMR data. The default outline mode has been changed to show the block outlines on the outer surface. |
|
|
(0029119)
|
Utkarsh Ayachit
|
2012-09-03 13:30
|
|
merged into master, if applicable. |
|
|
(0029351)
|
Alan Scott
|
2012-10-10 17:00
|
|
Closing, and will open another bug report if we need something more detailed. |
|