MantisBT - ParaView
View Issue Details
0013280ParaView(No Category)public2012-06-29 13:252012-10-29 17:04
Andy Bauer 
Andy Bauer 
normalminorhave not tried
closedfixed 
git-master 
3.98.0 
CoProcessing
13280_FileSeriesWriter_extents_problem
incorrect functionality
0013280: XMLPImageDataWriter not working properly in parallel
Running the following script with pvbatch with multiple processes has incorrect information in timage.pvti.
===========
try: paraview.simple
except: from paraview.simple import *
paraview.simple._DisableFirstRenderCameraReset()
Wavelet1 = Wavelet()
w = XMLPImageDataWriter()
w.FileName = "timage.pvti"
w.UpdatePipeline()
===========

For 6 processes, the file is:
=========
<VTKFile type="PImageData" version="0.1" byte_order="LittleEndian">
  <PImageData WholeExtent="-10 10 -10 -4 -10 0" GhostLevel="0" Origin="0 0 0" Spacing="1 1 1">
    <PPointData Scalars="RTData">
      <PDataArray type="Float32" Name="RTData"/>
    </PPointData>
    <Piece Extent="-10 0 -10 -4 -10 -7" Source="timage_0.vti"/>
    <Piece Extent="-10 -5 -10 -4 -7 0" Source="timage_1.vti"/>
    <Piece Extent="-5 0 -10 -4 -7 0" Source="timage_2.vti"/>
    <Piece Extent="0 10 -10 -4 -10 -7" Source="timage_3.vti"/>
    <Piece Extent="0 5 -10 -4 -7 0" Source="timage_4.vti"/>
    <Piece Extent="5 10 -10 -4 -7 0" Source="timage_5.vti"/>
  </PImageData>
</VTKFile>
=========

WholeExtent is wrong (it should be {-10, 10, -10, 10, -10, 10}). It's odd that it doesn't even match process 0's piece extent either.
No tags attached.
Issue History
2012-06-29 13:25Andy BauerNew Issue
2012-06-29 13:25Andy BauerAssigned To => Berk Geveci
2012-07-18 17:15Andy BauerAssigned ToBerk Geveci => Andy Bauer
2012-07-18 17:15Andy BauerStatusbacklog => todo
2012-07-18 17:16Andy BauerStatustodo => active development
2012-07-20 11:13Andy BauerTopic Name => 13280_FileSeriesWriter_extents_problem
2012-07-20 11:13Andy BauerNote Added: 0028888
2012-07-20 11:13Andy BauerStatusactive development => gatekeeper review
2012-07-20 11:13Andy BauerResolutionopen => fixed
2012-07-24 10:47Utkarsh AyachitFixed in Version => git-master
2012-07-24 10:48Utkarsh AyachitStatusgatekeeper review => customer review
2012-07-24 10:48Utkarsh AyachitNote Added: 0028900
2012-08-14 15:30Andy BauerStatuscustomer review => closed
2012-10-29 17:04Utkarsh AyachitFixed in Versiongit-master => 3.98.0

Notes
(0028888)
Andy Bauer   
2012-07-20 11:13   
Added 2 parallel python tests (same test actually that runs in symmetric and non-symmetric mode) that test for this problem. New tests are passing.
(0028900)
Utkarsh Ayachit   
2012-07-24 10:48   
merged into master, if applicable.