ParaQ:Telecon 09/13/2005 1PM EST: Difference between revisions
From ParaQ Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
Line 215: | Line 215: | ||
Begin by linking ParaQ lib with testing main built using components of KUnitTest and/or QTestLib. This would allow us to meet our initial testing goals. Then develop more complete testing framework as project progress. | Begin by linking ParaQ lib with testing main built using components of KUnitTest and/or QTestLib. This would allow us to meet our initial testing goals. Then develop more complete testing framework as project progress. | ||
==Decisions== |
Revision as of 15:25, 15 September 2005
Agenda
Item | People | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | KMor | Multiview update |
2 | CM | Report on testing solution for Qt. See #Qt Testing Requirements |
3 | CM | Present straw man class architecture for ParaView Server API |
4 | BW,DR | Present demo script. See #Demo Script |
5 | DR | Present Microsoft Project schedule overview |
6 | BW | Update on videocon equipment |
Demo Script
Section Author: David Rogers
This set of steps details the operations that the user will perform during the demo of early versions of ParaQ.
Requirements
- Platform: Windows XP.
|
Qt Testing Requirements
- Test for code coverage.
- Test GUI's interaction with server manager.
- Test GUI itself (e.g. button click leads to correct action & results) that's insensitive to layout.
- Easy to create test cases.
- Community's ability to test and contribute to testing.
- Integration with vtk's and paraview's testing framework (meaning leverage testing abilities already existent such as image comparisons and such)
- Drive demos, using the same framework.
Possible Solutions:
- Squish from Frog Logic
- $10,000 for license for complete application
- $400 for license to just run tests
- Community contribution limited because of license cost
- Possible Difficulty integrating with VTK and Paraview testing framework
- Application to be tested started as child process and so dynamic analysis will be difficult
- KD Executor
- Similar in cost and limitation to Squish
- KUnitTest
- BSD license
- Tests must be written in C++
- Designed for unit testing not complete application testing
- QTestLib
- Dual license
- Tests must be written in C++
- Designed for unit testing not complete application testing
- QTester
- Written by LLNL
- Not finished
- Not open source yet
- Python Scripting
- PyQt licensing cost.
- Limitation in PyQt in that the leaf class of C++ constructed object can't be accessed.
- Must maintain own C++ wrapped classes and utilities
Recommendation:
Begin by linking ParaQ lib with testing main built using components of KUnitTest and/or QTestLib. This would allow us to meet our initial testing goals. Then develop more complete testing framework as project progress.