ParaView 3 Telecon 09-23-2009

Item	People	Description
1	Moreland	Project Randy
2	Moreland	SC Tutorial
3	Geveci	ParaView + ADIOS
4	Moreland	Ultrascale Workshop
5	Ayachit	ParaView 3.8.1 Release
6	Moreland	Non-breaking python client tests
7	Moreland	Documenting Plugins
8	Moreland	Warning when ProcessRequests modifies itself
9	Moreland	Book omissions and errata
10	Utkarsh	Transition to git
11	Moreland	Stronger Dashboard Test consolidation Boiling the frog coverage

Project Randy

Previously:

Alan is still having problems scaling up past 5.5K cores or so, but this might be caused by the Red Sky system itself. Nathan reports similar problems using solvers without ParaView at all.

Ken got timings from Pat for running on Intrepid up to 32K cores. Pat has mentioned that might be some issues with the timings, possibly the job size being too big for the problem size.

In two weeks, Pat is going to Argonne and working with Vankate, who has been doing research on moving data quickly from computation platforms to visualization clusters. Going to integrate that into the coprocessing library.

We talked a bit about data staging. Everyone's doing it. Ken and Scott Klasky have had talked in the past about combining the paraview server with ADIOS data staging. Ken has an action item to send an email to Scott to perhaps organize a meeting at SC between Scott, Ken, and Berk.

Need good I/O comparisons between solver output and coprocessing output.

Can we distribute PHASTA with coprocessing adapter?

Today:

Supercomputing Tutorial

• Ken Moreland, Andy Bauer, Nathan Fabian, and Pat Marion
• CoProcessing tutorial

Need to collect the handout slides this week.

What example code can we provide? PHASTA? NPIC?

Warning when ProcessRequest modifies itself

Previously:

A while ago we talked about adding a check to the executive that issues a warning if it detects that its MTime changes during a call to ProcessRequest. Whatever happened to that? I just spent 2 days tracking down a parallel pipeline update problem that would have been quickly alerted had this been in place (and was easily fixed once I put my own check in place).

Berk suggested first adding the check only to ParaView. We will see how that works, and then possibly move to VTK. Kitware will take care of that.

On Berk's todo list. Berk is working on proposals for the ARB. One is to change the modularization of VTK. The other is to yank out VTK 4.0 compatibility, which will allow us to clean up vtkExecutive change.

Book omissions and errata

Previously:

Lisa is going to create a bug-tracker like functionality for the Kitware books.

Transition to git

Branchy workflow. Tie in to stronger dashboard.