Technical Meeting 04/13/2006 1:15PM EDT: Difference between revisions
From ParaQ Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| Utkarsh | |||
| Undo Redo overview | |||
|- | |- | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| A visit from "Berk The Enforcer" | |||
|- | |- | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 14: | Line 17: | ||
== Action Items == | == Action Items == | ||
* Berk Geveci - document unchecked property changes on the Wiki. | |||
* Tim Shead - update coding standards to require more thorough per-class documentation, and documentation of class implementations. | |||
* Group - update class documentation to meet the updated coding standards. | |||
* Tim / ETI - cleanup VTK leaks in time for the April release. | |||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
Utkarsh discussed his recent Undo/Redo checkins and fielded questions from the group. At Berk's request the group agreed that the coding standards should be expanded to provide additional high-level documentation of how each class fits into the overall design (this is in addition to the current practice of providing - at a minimum - a brief description of each public member of a class). Clinton committed to working on the accept/reset "layer" (he had already been volunteered for this job in absentia). Tim committed to getting widget naming issues done by the end of the week, and the team as a whole will attempt to eliminate all VTK leaks in time for the April release. | |||
Latest revision as of 16:28, 13 April 2006
Agenda
| Item | People | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utkarsh | Undo Redo overview |
| 2 | A visit from "Berk The Enforcer" | |
| 3 |
Action Items
- Berk Geveci - document unchecked property changes on the Wiki.
- Tim Shead - update coding standards to require more thorough per-class documentation, and documentation of class implementations.
- Group - update class documentation to meet the updated coding standards.
- Tim / ETI - cleanup VTK leaks in time for the April release.
Discussion
Utkarsh discussed his recent Undo/Redo checkins and fielded questions from the group. At Berk's request the group agreed that the coding standards should be expanded to provide additional high-level documentation of how each class fits into the overall design (this is in addition to the current practice of providing - at a minimum - a brief description of each public member of a class). Clinton committed to working on the accept/reset "layer" (he had already been volunteered for this job in absentia). Tim committed to getting widget naming issues done by the end of the week, and the team as a whole will attempt to eliminate all VTK leaks in time for the April release.
