ParaView 3.6 Deliverables: Difference between revisions
From ParaQ Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* Support reading other delimited text files. | * Support reading other delimited text files. | ||
* Simple conversion from tables to other data (such as collection of points). | * Simple conversion from tables to other data (such as collection of points). | ||
| Utkarsh | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Multicore | | Multicore | ||
| Multi-core desktops are becoming commonplace. It is now reasonable for a user to invest in an 8 core desktop with several GB of memory in lieu of a visualization cluster. Unfortunately, ParaView has no good way of taking advantage of the multiple cores. | | Multi-core desktops are becoming commonplace. It is now reasonable for a user to invest in an 8 core desktop with several GB of memory in lieu of a visualization cluster. Unfortunately, ParaView has no good way of taking advantage of the multiple cores. | ||
| Berk | |||
|- | |- | ||
| D4 | | D4 | ||
| Time to get rolling on the next generation distributed data decomposition filter. [[D4 Design]] | | Time to get rolling on the next generation distributed data decomposition filter. [[D4 Design]] | ||
| Andy Bauer | |||
|- | |- | ||
| More multiblock | | More multiblock | ||
| | | | ||
* Ability to map a partial array and have all blocks not having the array a solid color. | * Ability to map a partial array and have all blocks not having the array a solid color. | ||
| Zhanping | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Simplified state/scripting | | Simplified state/scripting | ||
| Right now getting any scripting in ParaView has a high learning curve. State files are unreadable and almost completely uneditable. To do any scripting at all, you need to learn a significant chunk of Python bindings. To make this easier, ParaView should output a much more friendly way of scripting things. Either the state written out should be much simpler (show only the things that pertain to the current view) or be able to write out a very simplified Python script to get back to the state, or both. | | Right now getting any scripting in ParaView has a high learning curve. State files are unreadable and almost completely uneditable. To do any scripting at all, you need to learn a significant chunk of Python bindings. To make this easier, ParaView should output a much more friendly way of scripting things. Either the state written out should be much simpler (show only the things that pertain to the current view) or be able to write out a very simplified Python script to get back to the state, or both. | ||
| Berk/Utkarsh | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Foreground color | | Foreground color | ||
| Add ability to specify a foreground color for a view (in addition to the background color). The foreground color is the default color for text, lines, and that sort of thing in 2D and 3D widgets. | | Add ability to specify a foreground color for a view (in addition to the background color). The foreground color is the default color for text, lines, and that sort of thing in 2D and 3D widgets. | ||
| Zhanping | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Particle Support | | Particle Support | ||
Line 41: | Line 47: | ||
** Sampling point cloud? | ** Sampling point cloud? | ||
** Surface extraction? | ** Surface extraction? | ||
| Zhanping/John Biddiscombe | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Movie view | | Movie view | ||
| Add movie file readers that behave like an image reader the supports time. When viewed in a 2D image view with the time controls, ParaView becomes a simple movie viewer. | | Add movie file readers that behave like an image reader the supports time. When viewed in a 2D image view with the time controls, ParaView becomes a simple movie viewer. | ||
| Zhanping | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Temporal cleanup | | Temporal cleanup | ||
Line 50: | Line 58: | ||
* Show continuous data set temporal bounds in info page | * Show continuous data set temporal bounds in info page | ||
* Plot/Probe over time, results should very in Sequence, Snap, and Real Time modes | * Plot/Probe over time, results should very in Sequence, Snap, and Real Time modes | ||
| Berk | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Plots along curves | | Plots along curves | ||
Line 55: | Line 64: | ||
* Intersection of surface with plane. | * Intersection of surface with plane. | ||
* Path between two points on a plane. | * Path between two points on a plane. | ||
| Berk/Utkarsh | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Custom filter cleanup | | Custom filter cleanup | ||
Line 61: | Line 71: | ||
** Reuse this dialog to implement an edit custom filter feature. | ** Reuse this dialog to implement an edit custom filter feature. | ||
* Implement links in custom filters. | * Implement links in custom filters. | ||
| Zhanping/Clint | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Shaders | | Shaders | ||
| Implementation in 2.6 is "experimental" and does not seem to be of any practical use to anyone. Utkarsh is working on new GPU pipeline stuff. Next generation should take advantage of that. | | Implementation in 2.6 is "experimental" and does not seem to be of any practical use to anyone. Utkarsh is working on new GPU pipeline stuff. Next generation should take advantage of that. | ||
: This may end up being documenting how to add new representations through plugins etc. [[User:Utkarsh|Utkarsh]] 09:32, 27 October 2008 (EDT) | |||
| Utkarsh | |||
|- | |- | ||
| vtkIdType size | | vtkIdType size | ||
| Currently the user must select the size of vtkIdType (32 vs 64) at compile time. This is not an ideal way to select the id size. Usually, you want 32 bit ids (for the smaller size), but when dealing with large MPI jobs, there is a chance you might need to represent global ids with 64 bits. We should look into possible ways to support selecting an Id size at run time without breaking backwards compatibility. | | Currently the user must select the size of vtkIdType (32 vs 64) at compile time. This is not an ideal way to select the id size. Usually, you want 32 bit ids (for the smaller size), but when dealing with large MPI jobs, there is a chance you might need to represent global ids with 64 bits. We should look into possible ways to support selecting an Id size at run time without breaking backwards compatibility. | ||
| Berk | |||
|- | |- | ||
| VisIt AVT Integration | | VisIt AVT Integration | ||
| We would like to pull VisIt components into ParaView (such as readers and filters). To this end, we would like to have an interface that would convert AVT to the VTK executives (or vice versa) so that we could leverage these without changing any code. | | We would like to pull VisIt components into ParaView (such as readers and filters). To this end, we would like to have an interface that would convert AVT to the VTK executives (or vice versa) so that we could leverage these without changing any code. | ||
| Burlen | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Statistics | | Statistics | ||
| Integrate Phillipe Pebay's statistics filtering and then some. | | Integrate Phillipe Pebay's statistics filtering and then some. | ||
| Zhanping | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Unordered Color maps | | Unordered Color maps | ||
| Some data values do not have any logical order associated with them. For example, block ids and process ids have identifiers that distinguish them, but there is no real meaning between the relationship of each pair. Thus, it makes little sense to use our standard linear color maps. A much better approach would be to map individual colors to values and show these colors as blocks in the color bar. VisIt demonstrates this quite nicely (although the colors they use aren't perfect). | | Some data values do not have any logical order associated with them. For example, block ids and process ids have identifiers that distinguish them, but there is no real meaning between the relationship of each pair. Thus, it makes little sense to use our standard linear color maps. A much better approach would be to map individual colors to values and show these colors as blocks in the color bar. VisIt demonstrates this quite nicely (although the colors they use aren't perfect). | ||
| Zhanping | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Better labeling | | Better labeling | ||
| The Infovis group has made a labeler that works well in 3D. We should integrate that into ParaView. | | The Infovis group has made a labeler that works well in 3D. We should integrate that into ParaView. | ||
| Zhanping | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Multithreaded UI | | Multithreaded UI | ||
| Right now, the UI pretty much works under one thread. When a pipeline update occurs, pretty much everything comes to a halt while the update happens. Likewise, a long render could cause everything to wait. We would like the ability to run pipeline updates and rendering on different threads so that the UI remains responsive. | | Right now, the UI pretty much works under one thread. When a pipeline update occurs, pretty much everything comes to a halt while the update happens. Likewise, a long render could cause everything to wait. We would like the ability to run pipeline updates and rendering on different threads so that the UI remains responsive. | ||
: This is a huge can of worms that would destabilize ParaView for a long time. Nothing in server manager is even close to being thread safe. I think we should focus on the actual use case: making the user interface responsive (i.e. progress reporting and abort) while processing occurs. [[User:Berk|Berk]] 08:43, 27 October 2008 (EDT) | : This is a huge can of worms that would destabilize ParaView for a long time. Nothing in server manager is even close to being thread safe. I think we should focus on the actual use case: making the user interface responsive (i.e. progress reporting and abort) while processing occurs. [[User:Berk|Berk]] 08:43, 27 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| Utkarsh | |||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 08:32, 27 October 2008
Name | Description | Owner |
---|---|---|
ParaView/Titan Chart Merger | If not already complete. | |
Tables |
|
Utkarsh |
Multicore | Multi-core desktops are becoming commonplace. It is now reasonable for a user to invest in an 8 core desktop with several GB of memory in lieu of a visualization cluster. Unfortunately, ParaView has no good way of taking advantage of the multiple cores. | Berk |
D4 | Time to get rolling on the next generation distributed data decomposition filter. D4 Design | Andy Bauer |
More multiblock |
|
Zhanping |
Simplified state/scripting | Right now getting any scripting in ParaView has a high learning curve. State files are unreadable and almost completely uneditable. To do any scripting at all, you need to learn a significant chunk of Python bindings. To make this easier, ParaView should output a much more friendly way of scripting things. Either the state written out should be much simpler (show only the things that pertain to the current view) or be able to write out a very simplified Python script to get back to the state, or both. | Berk/Utkarsh |
Foreground color | Add ability to specify a foreground color for a view (in addition to the background color). The foreground color is the default color for text, lines, and that sort of thing in 2D and 3D widgets. | Zhanping |
Particle Support | Leverage the work from CSCS.
|
Zhanping/John Biddiscombe |
Movie view | Add movie file readers that behave like an image reader the supports time. When viewed in a 2D image view with the time controls, ParaView becomes a simple movie viewer. | Zhanping |
Temporal cleanup |
|
Berk |
Plots along curves | Now you can plot along a line segment in space (defined by two endpoints). Users want to plot along other types of curves in space.
|
Berk/Utkarsh |
Custom filter cleanup |
|
Zhanping/Clint |
Shaders | Implementation in 2.6 is "experimental" and does not seem to be of any practical use to anyone. Utkarsh is working on new GPU pipeline stuff. Next generation should take advantage of that.
|
Utkarsh |
vtkIdType size | Currently the user must select the size of vtkIdType (32 vs 64) at compile time. This is not an ideal way to select the id size. Usually, you want 32 bit ids (for the smaller size), but when dealing with large MPI jobs, there is a chance you might need to represent global ids with 64 bits. We should look into possible ways to support selecting an Id size at run time without breaking backwards compatibility. | Berk |
VisIt AVT Integration | We would like to pull VisIt components into ParaView (such as readers and filters). To this end, we would like to have an interface that would convert AVT to the VTK executives (or vice versa) so that we could leverage these without changing any code. | Burlen |
Statistics | Integrate Phillipe Pebay's statistics filtering and then some. | Zhanping |
Unordered Color maps | Some data values do not have any logical order associated with them. For example, block ids and process ids have identifiers that distinguish them, but there is no real meaning between the relationship of each pair. Thus, it makes little sense to use our standard linear color maps. A much better approach would be to map individual colors to values and show these colors as blocks in the color bar. VisIt demonstrates this quite nicely (although the colors they use aren't perfect). | Zhanping |
Better labeling | The Infovis group has made a labeler that works well in 3D. We should integrate that into ParaView. | Zhanping |
Multithreaded UI | Right now, the UI pretty much works under one thread. When a pipeline update occurs, pretty much everything comes to a halt while the update happens. Likewise, a long render could cause everything to wait. We would like the ability to run pipeline updates and rendering on different threads so that the UI remains responsive.
|
Utkarsh |