SimpleITK/Tcon 2011 6 13: Difference between revisions

From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
**http://itk.org/gitweb?p=SimpleITK.git
**http://itk.org/gitweb?p=SimpleITK.git
** Jira supported: https://itk.icts.uiowa.edu/fisheye/browse
** Jira supported: https://itk.icts.uiowa.edu/fisheye/browse
** Fisheye + Crucible support code reviews on Stage: https://itk.icts.uiowa.edu/fisheye/cru?filter=allOpenReviews




Line 42: Line 43:
** Python is currently best supported
** Python is currently best supported
** C#, and R are currently "2nd Tier"
** C#, and R are currently "2nd Tier"
{| border="1"
|- bgcolor="#abcdef"
! OS !! Python !! Java !! Tcl? !! Lua? !! C#? !! R?
|-
| MacOSX (10.6) || 2.6 || 1.6 || 8.5 || 5.1 (optional) || Not supported (mono?) || 2.10 (optional)
|-
| Win XP/7 || 2.6 / 3.0 (optional) || 1.6 or later (optional) || 8.5 or later (optional) || 5.1 (optional) || 3.x || 2.10 (optional)
|-
| Linux || 2.6 / 3.0 (optional) || 1.6 or later (optional) || 8.5 or later (optional) || 5.1 (optional) || Not supported (mono?) || 2.10 (optional)
|}


= Action Items =
= Action Items =
Line 48: Line 60:
* Need to separate ITK library for SImpleITK
* Need to separate ITK library for SImpleITK
** No ITK includes in SimpleITK
** No ITK includes in SimpleITK
** DJB: is this really a necessity?  The only user this will be a problem for is the C++ user, and I would suspect that they don't mind all that much, especially if it is minimized.  I'd hate to see us waste a lot of effort for very little return.
* Organization of SimpleITK
* Organization of SimpleITK
** Clearly separate distributed header, from compiled code
** Clearly separate distributed header, from compiled code

Latest revision as of 17:51, 13 February 2013

Tcon Information

Phone Line: 

  Please join the following teleconference line:
      Toll-Free #:      1-800-704-9804 
      International #:  1-404-920-6604
      Participant Code: 61466276

  Wednesday, June 13th, 10:30am Eastern Time

  https://cc.readytalk.com/r/trndrwthtkkn

Attendees

  • David Cole
  • Dan Blezek
  • Brad Lowekamp
  • Luis Ibanez

IMPORTANT-new repository- IMPORTANT


Objective

  • Packaging and Distribution
    • Each Language should have separate download
    • What are the systems and versions of languages distributed?
    • URL location for distribution?
  • Installation
    • C++
  • Supported Languages
    • Python is currently best supported
    • C#, and R are currently "2nd Tier"
OS Python Java Tcl? Lua? C#? R?
MacOSX (10.6) 2.6 1.6 8.5 5.1 (optional) Not supported (mono?) 2.10 (optional)
Win XP/7 2.6 / 3.0 (optional) 1.6 or later (optional) 8.5 or later (optional) 5.1 (optional) 3.x 2.10 (optional)
Linux 2.6 / 3.0 (optional) 1.6 or later (optional) 8.5 or later (optional) 5.1 (optional) Not supported (mono?) 2.10 (optional)

Action Items

Blocking Task

  • Need to separate ITK library for SImpleITK
    • No ITK includes in SimpleITK
    • DJB: is this really a necessity? The only user this will be a problem for is the C++ user, and I would suspect that they don't mind all that much, especially if it is minimized. I'd hate to see us waste a lot of effort for very little return.
  • Organization of SimpleITK
    • Clearly separate distributed header, from compiled code
    • Separate SimpleITK interface form C++ template wacky-ness include
  • Need versioning info for SImpleITK
    • Would be good to include git TAG, if no tag the SHA in version

CMake Tasks

Other Tasks

Retrieved from "https://public.kitware.com/Wiki/index.php?title=SimpleITK/Tcon_2011_6_13&oldid=51499"