ITK/Release 4/Wrapping: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
* Make possible (easy?) to distribute binaries of the wrapping. | * Make possible (easy?) to distribute binaries of the wrapping. | ||
** Maybe use the package manager (Ryppl ?) | ** Maybe use the package manager (Ryppl ?). | ||
** The same goes for the C++ version. | |||
Revision as of 13:44, 19 July 2010
Wrapping
Requirements
- Avoid unnecessary dependencies
- Wrap +80% of the toolkit
- Have ITK look similar to the native wrapped language
Tools
- WrapITK
- Swig
- CableSwig
- MUMMY
Languages
What languages to wrap
- Python
- Lua ?
- Tcl ?
Discussions
Tcon July 19 2010
- Dropping CableSwig
- Using Swig Directly
- Along with GCC_XML
- Two Levels of Wrapping
- Wrapping the Simplified Layer (many wrapping tools will do)
- Wrapping the Templated Layer (WrapITK,GCC_XML)
- Managing multiple component images
- Microscopy use cases
- Remote Sensing cases
- itkVectorImage ?
- need a "component-by-component" filter driver ?
- Make easy to add new types (e.g. another pixel type for the image...)
- Run time binding may help here (along with the internal finder)
- Make possible (easy?) to distribute binaries of the wrapping.
- Maybe use the package manager (Ryppl ?).
- The same goes for the C++ version.
