ITK/Release 4/Wrapping
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
Wrapping
Requirements
- Avoid unnecessary dependencies
- Wrap +80% of the toolkit
- Have ITK look similar to the native wrapped language
Tools
- WrapITK
- Swig
- CableSwig
- MUMMY
Languages
What languages to wrap
- Python
- Lua ?
- Tcl ?
Discussions
Tcon July 19 2010
- Dropping CableSwig
- Using Swig Directly
- Along with GCC_XML
- Two Levels of Wrapping
- Wrapping the Simplified Layer (many wrapping tools will do)
- Wrapping the Templated Layer (WrapITK,GCC_XML)
- Managing multiple component images
- Microscopy use cases
- Remote Sensing cases
- itkVectorImage ?
- need a "component-by-component" filter driver ?
- Make easy to add new types (e.g. another pixel type for the image...)
- Run time binding may help here (along with the internal finder)
- Make possible (easy?) to distribute binaries of the wrapping.
- Maybe use the package manager (Ryppl ?).
- The same goes for the C++ version.
- Remove (or deprecate) itkSetVectorMacro and itkGetVectorMacro
they make the generated methods unusable in the target languages, and are not used that much in ITK
[glehmann@gbook build]$ grep -r etVectorMacro ~/src/Insight/Code/*/*.h | wc -l 34
They are used in two quite common filters - ChangeInformationImageFilter and PadImageFilter - and this makes this filter at least partly unusable in the target languages.
Agenda 081310
- gccxml maintenance
- Migrating to WrapITK 0.3
- recode igenerator.py in C++
- support for C#
- support for Python 3?
- support for Tcl?
- Redefine the WrapITK libraries (grouping of classes) — seems to be tightly linked to ITK_Release_4/Modularization.
- Default wrapped types and abbreviated naming scheme — some choices already made for SimpleITK, some stuff done as well in the microscopy group
- Wrapping coverage
- Binary distribution
- ITK Image to/from target language array conversion
- Automatic Inline documentation
- Target language inheritance (SWIG directors)
- Automatic type selection in Python
- Improve 64bits support in ITK — surely done elsewhere already
- GDCM wrapping integration?