[Paraview] Portable formats

[Berk Geveci]

> Thanks for your response.  I guess I was talking about visualization.  Would
> Ensight be considered an industry standard?

As close as you will get to a standard. If you are in the CFD field,
you may want to look into CGNS too. We will have CGNS support
relatively soon.

-berk


On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, j s <j.s4403 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your response.  I guess I was talking about visualization.  Would
> Ensight be considered an industry standard?
>
> Juan
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean by portable? Across visualization applications or
>> across platforms? Across visualization applications, you best bet is
>> probably EnSight.
>>
>> -berk
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:56 PM, j s <j.s4403 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I was wondering what everyone would consider to be the most portable
>> > format
>> > for:
>> >
>> > 1. multi-zone
>> > 2. unstructured
>> > 3. 2d or 3d
>> >
>> > mesh data.
>> >
>> > Thanks Everyone,
>> >
>> > Juan
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ParaView mailing list
>> > ParaView at paraview.org
>> > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>> >
>> >
>
>