[Paraview] Stream Tracer in eigenvector field
Burlen Loring
bloring at lbl.gov
Fri Aug 23 16:31:04 EDT 2013
Eigenvectors are unique up to a constantso if you took any eigenvector
and multiplied it by -1 it's still an eigenvector. You could see it in
the definition,
M x=\lambda x
eigenvector x appears in both sides of the eqn.
I had a similar problem with tensor glyphs in ParaView. In that case I
was able to solve by looking at the sign of the determinant of the
transformation matrix (see bug report, patch and mail list posts below).
I wonder if you could adapt/build on this solution there to solve your
issue here?
http://vtk.org/Bug/view.php?id=12179
http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/tensor-glyph-inward-pointing-surface-normals-td4388361.html
Burlen
On 08/23/2013 01:10 PM, Andy Bauer wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Apologies as my math is a bit rusty but isn't the sign of the
> eigenvector related to the sign of its corresponding eigenvalue? In
> that case if you make sure that all of the eigenvalues are positive
> then all of their corresponding eigenvectors should be aligned
> properly. If that's the case and you have access to the eigenvalues of
> the eigenvectors you could use the calculator or python calculator to
> properly orient the eigenvectors.
>
> In any case, if you can come up with an algorithm that properly
> orients the eigenvectors you should be able to do that in the python
> calculator or calculator filters. If not, then things could get a bit
> hairy as far as computationally figuring out which is the "proper"
> direction your eigenvalues should have.
>
> Regards,
> Andy
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, pwhiteho <pwhiteho at masonlive.gmu.edu
> <mailto:pwhiteho at masonlive.gmu.edu>> wrote:
>
> The term "eigenvector", used to describe the principal directions
> of a tensor, is a bit of a misnomer since it's not a "vector" as
> interpreted by the Stream Tracer filter - it's more accurately
> bi-directional like tension/compression and could be termed
> "eigenaxis/eigenaxes". When interpreted as a vector, there is an
> inherent sign ambiguity in each eigenvector - the sign is
> indeterminate and one is free to choose + or -, and that is
> exactly what Mathematica does ( likely true for other routines also ).
>
> I've been using Mathematica to prototype computations for the
> investigation of tensor topology which I then visualize in
> ParaView. Eigen-decomposition of a tensor field at each grid point
> returns an orthonormal set of eigenvectors, uncorrelated with any
> neighbors. Taken separately, each eigenvector field exhibits large
> regions of smoothly varying orientation, but there are systematic
> and random reversals of orientation that confound the Stream
> Tracer filter, sending streamlines wandering around the field.
> What is needed is a true tangent curve ( tensor line ) integrator
> that would avoid "doubling back" as the "streamline" propagates,
> similar to the scheme of Weinstein, et. al., ( IEEE VIS'99 ) which
> computes the dot product of the incoming propagation vector with
> the eigenvector; and if near -1, negate the outgoing propagation
> vector. This can also be fancied-up to accommodate noisy initial
> tensor data as in Weinstein.
>
> I think I would be taking on too much at this point in learning to
> write my own filter so have been exploring ways to pre-process the
> eigenvector fields before visualizing in Paraview, but I ask:
> 1. Have I missed something in existing filters that would handle this?
> 2. Can the existing Stream Tracer be modified?
> 3. Does the eigenvector routine in ParaView yield the same sign
> ambiguity among uncorrelated computations?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul W
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20130823/fbf984e1/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the ParaView
mailing list