View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0015949 | VTK | (No Category) | public | 2016-01-20 13:13 | 2016-08-12 09:55 | ||||
Reporter | Andy Bauer | ||||||||
Assigned To | Kitware Robot | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
Status | closed | Resolution | moved | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | 7.0.rcs | ||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
Summary | 0015949: 2nd order tensor storage inconsistency | ||||||||
Description | Some places in VTK use a C/row-major ordering of 2nd order tensors (vtkGradientFitler, vtkCell::Derivative()) and others assume a Fortran/column major ordering (vtkCellDerivatives, some of the numpy interface code). It's been decided that for consistency that VTK will go with C/row-major ordering. | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Project | TBD | ||||||||
Type | incorrect functionality | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
Relationships | |
Relationships |
Notes | |
(0035664) Andy Bauer (developer) 2016-01-20 13:15 |
FYI: this means that the proper ordering for tensor v_i,j is (v[0,0], v[0,1], v[0,2], v[1,0], v[1,1], v[1,2], v[2,0], v[2,1], v[2,2]) |
(0037447) Kitware Robot (administrator) 2016-08-12 09:55 |
Resolving issue as `moved`. This issue tracker is no longer used. Further discussion of this issue may take place in the current VTK Issues page linked in the banner at the top of this page. |
Notes |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2016-01-20 13:13 | Andy Bauer | New Issue | |
2016-01-20 13:15 | Andy Bauer | Note Added: 0035664 | |
2016-08-12 09:55 | Kitware Robot | Note Added: 0037447 | |
2016-08-12 09:55 | Kitware Robot | Status | backlog => closed |
2016-08-12 09:55 | Kitware Robot | Resolution | open => moved |
2016-08-12 09:55 | Kitware Robot | Assigned To | => Kitware Robot |
Issue History |
Copyright © 2000 - 2018 MantisBT Team |