ParaView 3 Telecon 12-04-2008: Difference between revisions
From ParaQ Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: {| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="4" |- ! style="background:#abcdef" | Item ! style="background:#abcdef" | People ! style="background:#abcdef" | Description |- | 1 || Karelitz || MARS/V&V Mi...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2 || Moreland || [[ParaView 3.6 Deliverables]] | | 2 || Moreland || [[ParaView 3.6 Deliverables]] | ||
|- | |||
| 3 || Pebay || Stats | |||
|} | |} | ||
== MARS == | == MARS == | ||
Fragment | Fragment extract of 2D AMR grids. We have a use case for this, and the current implementation does not support it. | ||
We have to prioritize what Charles should work on: 2D AMR, Regular Grids, Unstructured Grids, Performance Scaling. The most immediate concern is the 2D AMR. Lisa would like this soon. The most important, and a slightly (6 mo) longer term is the performance scaling (making sure that we can scale to 1000's of processes). | |||
Latest revision as of 13:26, 4 December 2008
| Item | People | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karelitz | MARS/V&V Milestone issues |
| 2 | Moreland | ParaView 3.6 Deliverables |
| 3 | Pebay | Stats |
MARS
Fragment extract of 2D AMR grids. We have a use case for this, and the current implementation does not support it.
We have to prioritize what Charles should work on: 2D AMR, Regular Grids, Unstructured Grids, Performance Scaling. The most immediate concern is the 2D AMR. Lisa would like this soon. The most important, and a slightly (6 mo) longer term is the performance scaling (making sure that we can scale to 1000's of processes).
